A partir del día 14 de junio de 2015, domingo, este blog dejará de ser actualizado como se ha venido haciendo hasta la fecha. La primera idea fue la de cerrar el blog, pero el deseo que que cuanto aquí se ha publicado pueda seguir siendo útil en el futuro, nos hace que mantengamos abierto el blog. Si tuviera alguna duda o quisiera hacer algún comentario, no tema hacerlo: seguiremos publicando cuantos comentarios se hagan y seguiremos contestando a las dudas que puedan surgir.
Gracias y hasta siempre.
Andrés Guerrero Serrano

viernes, 10 de junio de 2011

Low-fat diet may not increase diabetes risks

(Extraído de Yahoo News)

By Genevra Pittman | Reuters – Wed, Jun 8, 2011

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - While the low-fat diet craze led some doctors to worry that Americans would instead start eating too many carbohydrates, a new study suggests that eating low-fat doesn't have to increase carbohydrate-fueled health risks.

Instead, if extra carbohydrates are part of a diet plan that includes more fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, the risk of diabetes - the biggest related health concern -- could actually drop, at least in older women, according to the findings.

However, a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet could create problems in people who already have diabetes, researchers caution.

"Generally when people reduce the fat in the diet they replace it with carbohydrates," study author Dr. James Shikany told Reuters Health. "There was some concern that the increased carbohydrate intake might lead to if not increased diabetes itself...changes that over time could lead to diabetes."

"We had been telling women to decrease their fat intake for a long time and we really didn't know the possible effects this would have" on diabetes, added Shikany, from the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

The results suggest that balancing both diabetes and other disease risks requires considering the kinds of carbohydrates, fats, and proteins we eat, researchers said, rather than just cutting back on one food group and eating more of another.

The study, published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, included a group of about 2,300 postmenopausal women who were part of the Women's Health Initiative trial, which looked at the effect of diet and hormone therapy on disease risks.

About 900 of the women, selected randomly, were told to decrease their total fat intake so that fat accounted for about 20 percent of the calories in their diet. For a 2,000-calorie diet, that would mean eating 44 grams of fat each day.

As part of the new diet, women were also told to increase the number of fruit, vegetable, and grain servings they ate, and they attended regular sessions with nutritionists to help them do that.

The other 1,400 women, serving as a comparison group, were not given any extra nutritional guidance or told to change their diet.

The researchers followed women for the next 6 years with surveys on diet and exercise and also tested their blood for sugar and insulin levels to look for diabetes or its warning signs.

Women in the low-fat group, on average, said they got between 25 and 29 percent of their calories from fat in follow-up surveys. That compared to 36 to 37 percent in the group without a diet intervention.

U.S. government guidelines suggest adults get between 20 and 35 percent of their calories from fat.

The diet group also generally ate fewer total calories and more fruits, vegetables, grains, and sugar than the comparison group, on average.

After 1 year, women on the low-fat diet had lost more weight than the comparison group and had bigger decreases in their blood sugar and insulin levels. By 6 years, the groups looked similar on those measures. That told researchers that the lower-fat, higher-carbohydrate diet hadn't increased women's chances of getting diabetes.

However, in women who already had diabetes at the start of the study, those on the low-fat diet had a larger increase in blood sugar levels in the first year compared to women who didn't change their diet. That could be because people with diabetes had lost the ability to process the extra carbohydrates, Shikany said.

Carbohydrates are "obviously not a poison," said Dr. David Jenkins, head of the Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Center at St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto. "If eaten wisely (they're) useful."

However, in general, "we went from a diet that was rich in saturated fat and cholesterol and was also not good (to) a diet which was equally tasty, but relying on refining the carbohydrates in a particular way" that ups the risk of obesity and diabetes, Jenkins, who was not involved in the new research, told Reuters Health.

Refined carbohydrates include white bread and rice and sugary drinks and snacks.

Jenkins said that getting more fat and protein from vegetable sources, such as by eating beans or adding hummus or peanut butter to bread, is a good way to stave off both diabetes and heart disease.

Doctors now generally recommend a diet that has plenty of healthy, non-saturated fats, rather than one that tries to cut back on all fats, Shikany said - but that doesn't mean the new data isn't useful.

"Things have kind of changed, but there still are plenty of (doctors) who recommend low-fat diets and people who are on these diets," he said. "I certainly think it's a very safe diet, but the question is, is this the best diet?"

Mary Gannon, of the University of Minnesota, said that a diet lower in carbohydrates and higher in fat and protein may actually help people feel fuller sooner - which could lead to weight loss over time. In male patients with diabetes she has studied, men had the most improvement in diabetes markers when they got the smallest percent of their calories from carbohydrates.

Shikany added that because the research was limited to women age 50 and up, his findings don't necessarily apply to men or younger women on a low-fat diet.

SOURCE: http://bit.ly/ktCLuv American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, online May 11, 2011.

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario